Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: infra-bugs@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:01:49
Message-Id: 1374426099.20076.4.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook by justin
1 El dom, 21-07-2013 a las 16:46 +0200, justin escribió:
2 > On 7/21/13 4:26 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
3 > > On 07/21/2013 01:42 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
4 > >> Would be possible to generate and provide squashed files at the
5 > >> same time tarballs with portage tree snapshots are generated?
6 > >> mksquashfs can take a lot of resources depending on the machine,
7 > >> but providing the squashed images would still benefit people
8 > >> allowing them to download and mount them
9 > >
10 > > I've establish a cron job on my server to generate gzip and xz
11 > > squashed snapshots. I sync distfiles from utwente at 6:05 and generate
12 > > the squashfs at 6:35 after verifying the gpg signatures.
13 > > There's a 10,5h lag between snapshots and squashfs files - we could
14 > > improve if I'm allowed to sync against master rsync/dinstfiles.
15 > >
16 > > [1] http://lore.xmw.de/gentoo/genberry/snapshots/
17 > >
18 > >
19 >
20 > I am creating them as well. Perhaps we can bundle the effort.
21 >
22 > What I also found out that using zsync is quite efficient with squashfs
23 > images. I normally don't sync more then 20-30% of the image.
24 >
25 > Justin
26 >
27
28 Maybe infra could be contacted to try to share the effort (and also
29 offer the snapshot in a bit more "official" way, I mean, similar to
30 tarballs with snapshots)