| 1 |
On 9/3/06, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Because the thought that stable is always "stable" or that because we |
| 3 |
> released things are "stable" is incorrect ;) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
You're not supposed to break the stable tree; that surely must include |
| 6 |
stabilising a compiler (which is the _default_ for new installs) that |
| 7 |
can't compile all the packages marked stable for your arch. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
<grumble>Feels like one rule for one group (the package maintainers) |
| 10 |
and another for another group (releng / x86 arch team) to |
| 11 |
me.</grumble> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Best regards, |
| 14 |
Stu |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives