Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-portage/repoman/

[Zac Medico]

On 03/30/2018 01:42 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 30 marca 2018 09:07:03 CEST, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> napisał(a):
>> On 03/29/2018 10:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Dnia 30 marca 2018 06:30:14 CEST, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
>> napisał(a):
>>>> commit:     3f04d4d93d00afa5242a0c9459487c9eea7e9a6f
>>>> Author:     Zac Medico <zmedico <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
>>>> AuthorDate: Fri Mar 30 04:18:05 2018 +0000
>>>> Commit:     Zac Medico <zmedico <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
>>>> CommitDate: Fri Mar 30 04:30:05 2018 +0000
>>>> URL:
>>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3f04d4d9
>>>>
>>>> app-portage/repoman: version bump to 2.3.8
>>>>
>>>> This release adds support for plugin module systems.
>>>>
>>>> See:
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Repoman-Module-specs
>>>> Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.27_p1, Repoman-2.3.8
>>>
>>> Please revert this immediately. This was never finished, had open
>> concerns that were never addressed and the added Gentoo repository
>> files were never subject to proper RFC/review that was requested.
>>
>> I've disabled this feature by default, and hidden it behind an
>> --experimental-repository-modules=<y|n> option.
>
> That isn't going to work for me. Given that the yml files were added to repository without prior discussion, and contrary to the promises given by Portage team such discussion hasn't been started before merging the changes to master, I'd like to request removing all those files and not reintroducing them until Portage team specifies their format and brings it to open discussion.

Yeah I agree that the format really needs a proper specification. I've
gone ahead and removed them:

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f62e76a1e0202dcf55faa2b0fd9b21a1cd184dc8
-- 
Thanks,
Zac