Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>, gentoo-commits@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-portage/repoman/
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:42:27
Message-Id: 3F4226A7-F313-4F5E-A1D4-E3DF363C3007@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-portage/repoman/ by Zac Medico
1 Dnia 30 marca 2018 11:01:33 CEST, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> napisał(a):
2 >On 03/30/2018 01:42 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
3 >> Dnia 30 marca 2018 09:07:03 CEST, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
4 >napisał(a):
5 >>> On 03/29/2018 10:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
6 >>>> Dnia 30 marca 2018 06:30:14 CEST, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
7 >>> napisał(a):
8 >>>>> commit: 3f04d4d93d00afa5242a0c9459487c9eea7e9a6f
9 >>>>> Author: Zac Medico <zmedico <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
10 >>>>> AuthorDate: Fri Mar 30 04:18:05 2018 +0000
11 >>>>> Commit: Zac Medico <zmedico <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
12 >>>>> CommitDate: Fri Mar 30 04:30:05 2018 +0000
13 >>>>> URL:
14 >>>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3f04d4d9
15 >>>>>
16 >>>>> app-portage/repoman: version bump to 2.3.8
17 >>>>>
18 >>>>> This release adds support for plugin module systems.
19 >>>>>
20 >>>>> See:
21 >>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Repoman-Module-specs
22 >>>>> Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.27_p1, Repoman-2.3.8
23 >>>>
24 >>>> Please revert this immediately. This was never finished, had open
25 >>> concerns that were never addressed and the added Gentoo repository
26 >>> files were never subject to proper RFC/review that was requested.
27 >>>
28 >>> I've disabled this feature by default, and hidden it behind an
29 >>> --experimental-repository-modules=<y|n> option.
30 >>
31 >> That isn't going to work for me. Given that the yml files were added
32 >to repository without prior discussion, and contrary to the promises
33 >given by Portage team such discussion hasn't been started before
34 >merging the changes to master, I'd like to request removing all those
35 >files and not reintroducing them until Portage team specifies their
36 >format and brings it to open discussion.
37 >
38 >Yeah I agree that the format really needs a proper specification. I've
39 >gone ahead and removed them:
40 >
41 >https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f62e76a1e0202dcf55faa2b0fd9b21a1cd184dc8
42
43 Thanks. I hope this will let us start with a clean slate towards making a good format.
44
45
46 --
47 Best regards,
48 Michał Górny (by phone)

Replies