| 1 |
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:42:09PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dnia 30 marca 2018 11:01:33 CEST, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
> >On 03/30/2018 01:42 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Dnia 30 marca 2018 09:07:03 CEST, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
| 5 |
> >napisał(a): |
| 6 |
> >>> On 03/29/2018 10:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 7 |
> >>>> Dnia 30 marca 2018 06:30:14 CEST, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
| 8 |
> >>> napisał(a): |
| 9 |
> >>>>> commit: 3f04d4d93d00afa5242a0c9459487c9eea7e9a6f |
| 10 |
> >>>>> Author: Zac Medico <zmedico <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
| 11 |
> >>>>> AuthorDate: Fri Mar 30 04:18:05 2018 +0000 |
| 12 |
> >>>>> Commit: Zac Medico <zmedico <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
| 13 |
> >>>>> CommitDate: Fri Mar 30 04:30:05 2018 +0000 |
| 14 |
> >>>>> URL: |
| 15 |
> >>>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3f04d4d9 |
| 16 |
> >>>>> |
| 17 |
> >>>>> app-portage/repoman: version bump to 2.3.8 |
| 18 |
> >>>>> |
| 19 |
> >>>>> This release adds support for plugin module systems. |
| 20 |
> >>>>> |
| 21 |
> >>>>> See: |
| 22 |
> >>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Repoman-Module-specs |
| 23 |
> >>>>> Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.27_p1, Repoman-2.3.8 |
| 24 |
> >>>> |
| 25 |
> >>>> Please revert this immediately. This was never finished, had open |
| 26 |
> >>> concerns that were never addressed and the added Gentoo repository |
| 27 |
> >>> files were never subject to proper RFC/review that was requested. |
| 28 |
> >>> |
| 29 |
> >>> I've disabled this feature by default, and hidden it behind an |
| 30 |
> >>> --experimental-repository-modules=<y|n> option. |
| 31 |
> >> |
| 32 |
> >> That isn't going to work for me. Given that the yml files were added |
| 33 |
> >to repository without prior discussion, and contrary to the promises |
| 34 |
> >given by Portage team such discussion hasn't been started before |
| 35 |
> >merging the changes to master, I'd like to request removing all those |
| 36 |
> >files and not reintroducing them until Portage team specifies their |
| 37 |
> >format and brings it to open discussion. |
| 38 |
> > |
| 39 |
> >Yeah I agree that the format really needs a proper specification. I've |
| 40 |
> >gone ahead and removed them: |
| 41 |
> > |
| 42 |
> >https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f62e76a1e0202dcf55faa2b0fd9b21a1cd184dc8 |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> Thanks. I hope this will let us start with a clean slate towards making a good format. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
If there is some distro policy that this repoman enhancement violated, |
| 47 |
that's fine and I would like to know about it, but I'm not aware of it. |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
If there isn't, as far as I know, there is no reason for it to be |
| 50 |
blocked. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
Thanks, |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
William |
Archives