| 1 |
On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2007/07/10, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > the no* flags were introduced more to address default behavior than |
| 4 |
> > the -* case, so yes we can kick many of the no* USE flags |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> To address only the default behavior, adding "foo" to the profile USE |
| 7 |
> instead of using a "nofoo" flag would have been enough. This could |
| 8 |
> have been done long ago, but my understanding has always been that it |
| 9 |
> was not considered a good enough solution because it was not -*-proof. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
for some flags yes ... for others, i dislike that idea for the exact same |
| 12 |
reason for the other profile-based suggestions: these defaults should live in |
| 13 |
the ebuild, not the profile |
| 14 |
-mike |
Archives