| 1 |
> I disagree with separate packages, if it's possible to build both at |
| 2 |
> once. That's the point of USE flags. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I'd say that's fine in the general case, but with a slotted package it's |
| 5 |
going to be extremely messy. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I think we're in agreement that "qt" should represent the most recent |
| 8 |
version supported by the particular package. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
If people want to create local use flags for the older qt3 version, I |
| 11 |
suppose that's ok, but I think you're going to start running into using a |
| 12 |
lot of "build_with_use" statements to see if that version was built or |
| 13 |
not. It seems cleaner from the ebuild perspective just to be able to put |
| 14 |
in a dep on a package name rather than a pseudo-hack in order to support |
| 15 |
multiple interfaces via a single ebuild. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Caleb |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives