| 1 |
Caleb Tennis wrote: |
| 2 |
>> Currently we are at 4), should we change anything? |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> My proposal: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I would personally like to stay with just the "qt" use flag. The use flag |
| 7 |
> will be for support of whichever version of Qt is supported (v3 or v4) for |
| 8 |
> the particular emerge. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> In the cases where more than one version is supported, it should be for |
| 11 |
> Qt4 only. The Qt3 version should be a separate emerge. For example, in |
| 12 |
> the case of the poppler bindings, there should be a poppler-bindings-qt3 |
| 13 |
> package. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> It's not pretty, but I think it's the best tradeoff we have. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
My counterproposal: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The newest version of any package should always have the unversioned |
| 20 |
flag. Versioned flags should be for a conscious choice to use a less |
| 21 |
current package. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I disagree with separate packages, if it's possible to build both at |
| 24 |
once. That's the point of USE flags. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Thanks, |
| 27 |
Donnie |
Archives