Archives
Archives
| From: | Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Dependencies on system packages | ||
| Date: | Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:30:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | em5fs9$md9$1@sea.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies on system packages by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | > That one pulls us back into the lack of distinction between "stuff |
| 3 | > needed when compiling against this library" and "stuff this library |
| 4 | > needs to run". |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | Wouldn't your c-toolchain or a compiler eg for PERL or Java do? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > | or by using meta-packages. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > DEPEND="virtual/c-toolchain" would indeed be nice, but it's a rather |
| 11 | > large change... |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | How so? Isn't it simply a new meta? |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Dependencies on system packages | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> |