| 1 |
On 11/17/2012 11:28 PM, Greg KH wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:06:38PM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 11/17/2012 10:39 PM, Greg KH wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Anyway, I now see a _very_ dangerous commit in the "Copyright" branch |
| 5 |
>>> that better not get merged into the tree, as it's wrong, and illegal |
| 6 |
>>> under all countries that follow the "normal" body of Copyright Law. It |
| 7 |
>>> should be removed right now before someone gets into trouble, not the |
| 8 |
>>> least of which would be the orginization that the copyright is now being |
| 9 |
>>> attributed to. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Come on people, this is basic copyright law, it's not something |
| 12 |
>>> radically new. It's something that _all_ software developers should |
| 13 |
>>> know, either from school, or any company they have ever worked at. |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> Please fix this now. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> klondike discussed the copyright branch changes with robbat2 before they |
| 18 |
>> started and there was no problem at the time. We have retained all |
| 19 |
>> copyright notices and looking at the branch, I find nothing objectionable. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Seriously? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Look at the comment I made on that commit for details, but here it is |
| 24 |
> again: |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> You can not claim copyright on a file you did not do one of the two |
| 27 |
> things: |
| 28 |
> - create yourself |
| 29 |
> - modify in a "major" manner |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Adding a comment at the top saying it is part of the eudev project and |
| 32 |
> covered under the LGPL2+ does not meet either of these requirements at |
| 33 |
> all. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> By merely importing a file into a new project, you can not claim |
| 36 |
> copyright on it. That's the law. The fact that this was reviewed by |
| 37 |
> someone makes me seriously wonder about the copyright policies of the |
| 38 |
> Gentoo Foundation. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> Also, you can not assign copyright to a third party, unless you have a |
| 41 |
> copyright assignment form. Do the developers doing this work have such |
| 42 |
> a form assigned? And in what country and state is that form valid for? |
| 43 |
> Different countries, and states, have different laws here, and |
| 44 |
> one-form-fits-all is not true anywhere. |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> So blindly adding a Gentoo Foundation copyright to _any_ file in this |
| 47 |
> repo, that has not met one of the two above rules, is illegal, and |
| 48 |
> grounds for opening the Gentoo Foundation up to big trouble. |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
>> Would you mind joining us in IRC to discuss your concerns? |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> I don't do IRC anymore, sorry. Email is the best way to reach me. |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
> thanks, |
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
> greg k-h |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
Thanks for clarifying that. It will be fixed before it goes into HEAD. |
Archives