Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Greg KH <gregkh@g.o>
To: Richard Yao <ryao@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, klondike@g.o, "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>, ulm@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:27:50
Message-Id: 20121118042804.GA3087@kroah.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012) by Richard Yao
1 On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:06:38PM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
2 > On 11/17/2012 10:39 PM, Greg KH wrote:
3 > > Anyway, I now see a _very_ dangerous commit in the "Copyright" branch
4 > > that better not get merged into the tree, as it's wrong, and illegal
5 > > under all countries that follow the "normal" body of Copyright Law. It
6 > > should be removed right now before someone gets into trouble, not the
7 > > least of which would be the orginization that the copyright is now being
8 > > attributed to.
9 > >
10 > > Come on people, this is basic copyright law, it's not something
11 > > radically new. It's something that _all_ software developers should
12 > > know, either from school, or any company they have ever worked at.
13 > >
14 > > Please fix this now.
15 >
16 > klondike discussed the copyright branch changes with robbat2 before they
17 > started and there was no problem at the time. We have retained all
18 > copyright notices and looking at the branch, I find nothing objectionable.
19
20 Seriously?
21
22 Look at the comment I made on that commit for details, but here it is
23 again:
24
25 You can not claim copyright on a file you did not do one of the two
26 things:
27 - create yourself
28 - modify in a "major" manner
29
30 Adding a comment at the top saying it is part of the eudev project and
31 covered under the LGPL2+ does not meet either of these requirements at
32 all.
33
34 By merely importing a file into a new project, you can not claim
35 copyright on it. That's the law. The fact that this was reviewed by
36 someone makes me seriously wonder about the copyright policies of the
37 Gentoo Foundation.
38
39 Also, you can not assign copyright to a third party, unless you have a
40 copyright assignment form. Do the developers doing this work have such
41 a form assigned? And in what country and state is that form valid for?
42 Different countries, and states, have different laws here, and
43 one-form-fits-all is not true anywhere.
44
45 So blindly adding a Gentoo Foundation copyright to _any_ file in this
46 repo, that has not met one of the two above rules, is illegal, and
47 grounds for opening the Gentoo Foundation up to big trouble.
48
49 > Would you mind joining us in IRC to discuss your concerns?
50
51 I don't do IRC anymore, sorry. Email is the best way to reach me.
52
53 thanks,
54
55 greg k-h

Replies