Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Richard Yao <ryao@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@g.o>, klondike@g.o, "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>, ulm@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:09:53
Message-Id: 50A85ECE.9020601@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012) by Greg KH
1 On 11/17/2012 10:39 PM, Greg KH wrote:
2 > Anyway, I now see a _very_ dangerous commit in the "Copyright" branch
3 > that better not get merged into the tree, as it's wrong, and illegal
4 > under all countries that follow the "normal" body of Copyright Law. It
5 > should be removed right now before someone gets into trouble, not the
6 > least of which would be the orginization that the copyright is now being
7 > attributed to.
8 >
9 > Come on people, this is basic copyright law, it's not something
10 > radically new. It's something that _all_ software developers should
11 > know, either from school, or any company they have ever worked at.
12 >
13 > Please fix this now.
14
15 klondike discussed the copyright branch changes with robbat2 before they
16 started and there was no problem at the time. We have retained all
17 copyright notices and looking at the branch, I find nothing objectionable.
18
19 Would you mind joining us in IRC to discuss your concerns?

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies