Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
To: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: drobbins@g.o, games@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Enemy Territory and Gentoo
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:51:45
Message-Id: 200309221651.41984.luke-jr@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Enemy Territory and Gentoo by Chris Gianelloni
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Monday 22 September 2003 02:54 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
5 #3. we have no control over the
6 > installation path, so portage cannot track the files.
7 Why is it that Portage is able to catch file access outside of the sandbox,
8 but cannot remap the access to the correct location in $WORKDIR? It sounds
9 logical. Is there a reason it isn't/can't be done?
10 - --
11 Luke-Jr
12 Developer, Gentoo Linux
13 http://www.gentoo.org/
14 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
15 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
16
17 iD8DBQE/byiZZl/BHdU+lYMRApvtAJwJ79Wzz2+ZLc57AeElvlimITvQ6ACcCbqP
18 tVzR5XNQhM0jKbxFIAPle6k=
19 =IjJM
20 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
21
22
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Enemy Territory and Gentoo Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@×××××××××××××××××××.net>