Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 06:05:42
Message-Id: 45FB84C3.8070501@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 03:11 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
3 >> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:25:17 -0400
4 >> "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o> wrote:
5 >>
6 >>> Hierarchy would be the following
7 >>>
8 >>> snapshot -> dev -> build -> alpha -> beta ....
9 >> And that's where the problems start. As you said yourself _snapshot is
10 >> something universal so it doesn't really fit anywhere in the chain.
11 >
12 > Yes, order wise snapshots might be quite confusing. Not sure if a well
13 > defined definition would clear that up.
14 >
15 >> Similar for _build, it usually runs parallel to normal versioning (a
16 >> release also has a build number).
17 >
18 > That's more something specific to say glassfish where builds are weekly
19 > https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/downloadsindex.html#Promoted_binary_builds
20 >
21 > With major ones being milestones, similar to Netbeans.
22 > https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/downloadsindex.html#Milestone_binary_builds
23 >
24 > Glassfish alone is likely to comprise of a guestimated ~20 or so
25 > packages. It's Sun's formerly closed source J2EE stack for the most
26 > part. Very possible could be more, formerly know as WSDP
27 > http://java.sun.com/webservices/jwsdp/index.jsp
28 >
29 >> At best older
30 >> portage versions would ignore ebuilds using these new suffixes
31 >> resulting in confused users, worst case stuff starts breaking.
32 >> If you want to pursue this you should get some numbers of how many
33 >> packages could actually make use of these new features, it simply isn't
34 >> worth thinking about it for just a handful of packages.
35
36 Bleh; you have to break it at one point anyhow; you added the cvs
37 suffix, no? :)
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list