Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 18:54:58
Message-Id: 56C0CD44.4010604@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes by "Andreas K. Hüttel"
1 On 02/14/2016 07:44 PM, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
2 > On Sunday 14 February 2016 13:18:30 Rich Freeman wrote:
3 >> Feel free to peruse the various list discussions and council logs.
4 >> Most of what you're bringing up has come up before.
5 > Thanks rich0, you seem to be reading my mind.
6 >
7 > This is turning into a severe case of "I didn't bother to speak up earlier or
8 > volunteer to improve something, and now I'm unhappy with what was decided and
9 > implemented."
10 >
11 Silly me for assuming that changes to metadata would not affect me.
12 Or that tools would be adapted to the changes.
13
14 Or that the changes would make sense.
15
16 I don't have time to follow every little change, so it's quite annoying
17 to reverse-engineer this change that apparently is a compromise that no
18 one actually wanted, and hasn't really been finished yet. Sigh.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o>