| 1 |
28.2.2006, 17:24:21, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hi Jakub, |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> If you don't agree with the contents, why didn't you raise your |
| 6 |
> opposition earlier? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I don't feel any need to raise opposition against some unofficial manual, |
| 9 |
what would be the point in that? I'm raising my hand against silently |
| 10 |
incorporating parts of it (that affect a lot of stuff in the tree) into |
| 11 |
official docs without a proper discussion, even more so that they are being |
| 12 |
claimed as an official QA policy now. Documents located in private devspace |
| 13 |
of some devs are non-official and noone checks their contents for |
| 14 |
correctness, they are private activity of those devs. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> If you agree with the contents, please ask yourself if the current |
| 17 |
> discussion is necessary. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
See above. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Best regards, |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Jakub Moc |
| 25 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 26 |
GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 27 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives