| 1 |
Yes the program looks in @INC for the modules and no the name of the program |
| 2 |
is not mainprog.pl. How can I put the two modules in the @INC the gentoo way. |
| 3 |
I saw that there is a perl eclass, but I am not sure how to use it correctly. |
| 4 |
I will file a Bug when the program works. Or should I already file a bug? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Until now I have submitted several ebuilds and patches but none made it into |
| 7 |
the portage tree.... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 11:12, Michael Cummings wrote: |
| 10 |
> Well, first off, how does the program look for the perl modules? If it |
| 11 |
> isn't suggesting that you place them in your @INC, then it is most likely |
| 12 |
> loading them directly. So it all depends on how the main script (please |
| 13 |
> tell me it isn't really called mainprog.pl) tries to load those modules as |
| 14 |
> to the best place to put them. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> /me waits for the bug report for this one |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> On Wednesday 25 May 2005 02:06 am, Rene Zbinden wrote: |
| 19 |
> > Hi |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > I am writing a new ebuild. The program contains a perlscript |
| 22 |
> > (mainprog.pl) which needs two perl modules like (module1.pm module2.pm) |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > I will put mainprog.pl in /usr/bin but where do I put the two modules. |
| 25 |
> > Shall I put them in /usr/share/programename and put that to the perl |
| 26 |
> > path? |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> > -- |
| 29 |
> > cheers, |
| 30 |
> > reen |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
cheers, |
| 34 |
reen |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives