| 1 |
Please get upstream to apply the patch and release a new sudo version. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Simple as this: -pam is not by default tested and you keep the pieces if it |
| 4 |
breaks. If you can get upstream to just apply that patch, you solve your |
| 5 |
problem. Insulting developers as it's happening on that bug will bring you |
| 6 |
nowhere. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 9 |
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
On 5 October 2014 11:18, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> In bug 524074 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524074), Joshua |
| 14 |
> Kinard mentioned that Gentoo cannot support systems where PAM isn't |
| 15 |
> installed. I'd like to know whether this is true or not, especially since |
| 16 |
> no part of the system seems to actually require it. It is there if you need |
| 17 |
> it. I don't have a use for it, personally. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> (The issue at hand is that sudo links against -lshadow, which should not |
| 20 |
> happen and therefore that link command removed from the build.) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
Archives