Archives
Archives
| From: | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Are users forced to use PAM? |
| Date: | Sun, 05 Oct 2014 10:19:18 |
| Message-Id: | m0r5u4$id0$1@ger.gmane.org |
| 1 | In bug 524074 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524074), Joshua |
| 2 | Kinard mentioned that Gentoo cannot support systems where PAM isn't |
| 3 | installed. I'd like to know whether this is true or not, especially |
| 4 | since no part of the system seems to actually require it. It is there if |
| 5 | you need it. I don't have a use for it, personally. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | (The issue at hand is that sudo links against -lshadow, which should not |
| 8 | happen and therefore that link command removed from the build.) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Are users forced to use PAM? | Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Are users forced to use PAM? | Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Are users forced to use PAM? | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> |