Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml?
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:34:44
Message-Id: 45F99ED4.3040808@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? by Stephen Becker
1 Stephen Becker napsal(a):
2 > On 3/15/07, Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
3 >> Yeah indeed, lets get the facts straight and let's see who did behave
4 >> like an asshole:
5 >>
6 >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=110676&action=view
7 >
8 > Indeed both of us were assholes that day, I never denied that. The
9 > difference is, Diego was being an asshole to somebody who was merely
10 > trying to test packages in a manner consistent with his training as an
11 > arch dev. I was being an asshole to Diego for being an asshole.
12
13 No, Diego asked to not keyword an obsolete KDE meta version ~mips
14 because we all know the history with MIPS keywording and lingering stale
15 crap in portage; also because it's completely unneeded for KDE support
16 on mips and also because it'd create a huge and pointless maintenance
17 overhead for already understaffed KDE team. That definitely doesn't
18 qualify as 'being an asshole', it was a legitimate maintainer's request
19 based on long-term experience with mips team.
20
21 >> Indeed, so eroyf was told to stop screwing up, he just didn't get it
22 >> (apparently neither did you, for that matter). And don't start this
23 >> 'mips needs more babysitting' nonsense here again, please.
24 >
25 > You really need to stop putting words in people's mouths. That makes
26 > you an asshole without reason, and now I'm being an asshole to you
27 > because you are being an asshole. In other words, shut up and take
28 > your bullshit FUD about the mips team out of this discussion, and go
29 > wrangle some bugs.
30
31 I'm not putting anything in anyone's mouth, and I'd suggest that you
32 wash your mouth before further posting to this mailing list, your
33 vocabulary is kinda ridiculous.
34
35 Plus, everyone can read the babysitting history on the relevant
36 keywording bug (yeah if anyone wonders, kdelibs still unkeyworded about
37 5 months after the bug has been filed).
38
39
40 --
41 Best regards,
42
43 Jakub Moc
44 mailto:jakub@g.o
45 GPG signature:
46 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
47 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
48
49 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>