| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> What discussion? As both myself and Grant pointed out on this list |
| 4 |
> before the meeting, there wasn't any. Yet the council decided to go |
| 5 |
> ahead and approve the thing anyway... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Discussion and intermediary decision. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The intermediary decision (during the October meeting, one month ago) |
| 10 |
was that the GLEP would be approved, pending a list of changes. During |
| 11 |
last month, nobody raised his voice to say this list of changes was |
| 12 |
fundamentally flawed. Which in the gentoo-dev world, is quite outstanding. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Then those changes were added, no more, no less, so the GLEP was |
| 15 |
approved. It's not as if the new version was a rewrite from scratch. |
| 16 |
It's just implementation of required changes that nobody complained |
| 17 |
about for a whole month... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Koon |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives