1 |
On Saturday 19 November 2005 12:00, Thierry Carrez wrote: |
2 |
> The intermediary decision (during the October meeting, one month ago) |
3 |
> was that the GLEP would be approved, pending a list of changes. During |
4 |
> last month, nobody raised his voice to say this list of changes was |
5 |
> fundamentally flawed. Which in the gentoo-dev world, is quite outstanding. |
6 |
|
7 |
Probably because never a revised GLEP was presented?! I think the way to |
8 |
approve a GLEP that still "needs" changes isn't acceptable. There's a lot of |
9 |
information in these lists and I suppose very few ones have the time to read |
10 |
everything, so I did not read the council meeting stuff. Nevertheless, the |
11 |
very least to expect is that a possible final GLEP gets posted and discussed |
12 |
a while before it possibly will be approved. |
13 |
|
14 |
Personally I really don't care about the email address, even though I don't |
15 |
understand why we should unnecessarily overcomplicate things. But the way the |
16 |
base (a GLEP in this case) of decisions get changed by the council behind all |
17 |
of us is misuse of power. Obviously this was noticed by the members of the |
18 |
council as well, but the question why you didn't postpone the decision |
19 |
stands. The GLEP process needs to be a bit more formalized as it seems. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
Carsten |