| 1 |
On 19 January 2013 03:22, Christoph Junghans <ottxor@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2013/1/17 Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>: |
| 3 |
>> After some initial bikeshedding we came to the conclusion that naming |
| 4 |
>> the category simply "qt" is the most elegant solution. We will then |
| 5 |
>> also be dropping the qt- prefix in package names. This means |
| 6 |
>> x11-libs/qt-core will be moved to qt/core, and so on. |
| 7 |
> -1 |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I don't like the idea of emerging gui instead qt-qui. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The thing is you would practically never have to do this. Users |
| 12 |
install apps that have a number of qt modules as dependencies. These |
| 13 |
qt modules in turn cannot be updated individually (unless there is an |
| 14 |
ebuild revision bump), but will be included in a world update as a |
| 15 |
group. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And if you really must, is emerge qt/gui so much more difficult than |
| 18 |
emerge qt-gui? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Cheers, |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 24 |
Gentoo developer |
| 25 |
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |
Archives