Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:15:00
Message-Id: 7c612fc60707121510o520cfbe7y4036aa2c83f7280b@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes by Seemant Kulleen
1 On 7/12/07, Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> wrote:
2 > My only comment for now is: why not just make -core read only, but
3 > public, and leave -dev as it is? That way we don't have to muck around
4 > with deprecating lists and introducing new ones.
5
6 That looks like a good idea to me if the mandatory communication
7 (package retirement announcements, USE flag discussions, etc...) is
8 moved to -core. If not, I don't see the point.
9
10 Also I still think we need a private mailing list. Whether it's used
11 often or not shouldn't be a metric for the decision. And if things get
12 leaked out as Mike says, then it's an entirely different issue that
13 deserves an entirely different type of resolution on a case by case
14 basis involving the source of the leak, not the list.
15
16 Denis.
17 --
18 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list