| 1 |
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:07:24 -0500 |
| 2 |
Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 12/03/2014 07:28 AM, Diamond wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:38:44 +0100 |
| 6 |
> > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> # Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> (01 Dec 2014) |
| 10 |
> >> # Upstream dead for a long time, use sys-power/cpupower |
| 11 |
> >> # instead. Removal in a month. |
| 12 |
> >> sys-power/cpufrequtils |
| 13 |
> >> x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpufreq |
| 14 |
> >> |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > Give us an alternative before removing x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpufreq. |
| 17 |
> > This plugin still works great for me. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> It doesn't look like it's going to work so well without cpufrequtils. |
| 21 |
> There's a new homepage with a few new releases at: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> http://chw.populus.org/rub/7 |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> The latest 0.6.4 has an INSTALL file that says it requires |
| 26 |
> cpufrequtils. I also see a "cpufreqnextgovernor" script that uses |
| 27 |
> binaries from sys-power/cpufrequtils. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Glancing at the code, it might still be able to read the current |
| 30 |
> frequency from /proc/cpuinfo or somewhere under /sys without |
| 31 |
> cpufrequtils (can you confirm?), but at best that leaves the plugin |
| 32 |
> half-broken without an update. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
I did emerge -C sys-power/cpufrequtils and then restarted gkrellm. It |
| 37 |
looks like this plugin still shows P-states wich is enough for me. But |
| 38 |
I haven't tried restart it yet. And also haven't tried to remerge |
| 39 |
x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpufreq. It probably won't wich is sad. I |
| 40 |
personally don't need user-changing of the governor, kernel default |
| 41 |
ondemand governor is OK for me. I just need to see P-states in |
| 42 |
real-time in gkrellm. |
Archives