| 1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 12 May 2013, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> Earlier you said: "Just to clarify, i never said I wanted to |
| 4 |
>> deprecated the git.overlays.gentoo.org repo." |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
>> Have I missed something? Last time I looked, github's server |
| 7 |
>> software wasn't open source. Why should we use non-free tools for a |
| 8 |
>> central piece of Gentoo documentation? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> The repository is still accessible in http://git.overlays.gentoo.org |
| 11 |
> and read-only access is still available. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
In what way is removing write access different from deprecating the |
| 14 |
repository? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> However, the write access removed because of potential conflicts |
| 17 |
> between g.o.g.o and github. If you can guarantee me that people will |
| 18 |
> not mess things up and not commit only to one of the to remotes, |
| 19 |
> then we can enable write access again. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I for my part won't push anything to a devmanual repo hosted at |
| 22 |
github. As this presumably means that I won't be able to contribute |
| 23 |
any more, I've now removed myself from the devmanual mail alias. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Ulrich |
Archives