Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Pagano <mpagano@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:12:10
Message-Id: 20200213121204.GA19275@woodpecker.gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum by "Sam Jorna (wraeth)"
1 On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 06:46:43PM +1100, Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote:
2 > On Thursday, 13 February 2020 5:40:46 AM AEDT Matt Turner wrote:
3 > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:59 AM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
4 > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 06:54:19PM +1100, Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote:
5 > > > > On Monday, 10 February 2020 7:55:01 AM AEDT Michał Górny wrote:
6 > > > > > On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
7 > > > > > > Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232
8 > > > > > > lines of
9 > > > > > > Manifest?!
10 > > > > >
11 > > > > > Pardon mine but do 'we' really need to read your useless comments
12 > > > > > everywhere, all the time and just get irritated for no benefit to
13 > > > > > Gentoo?
14 > > > >
15 > > > > Perhaps I'm the one being ignorant here, but why are we lambasting
16 > > > > someone for seeking clarification about an unusual inclusion on a
17 > > > > review thread?>
18 > > > I wasn't going to say anything, but I can't let this go by without
19 > > > commenting.
20 > > >
21 > > > Sam is correct. Maybe the tone is a bit off, (and that is debatable),
22 > > > but this definitely can be seen as a legit question, regardless of other
23 > > > things Michael has posted.
24 > >
25 > > Unfortunately it's not about a single issue or email. It's a
26 > > consistent pattern that multiple people have asked him to rein in over
27 > > a long period. :(
28 >
29 > Without going into specifics, veremit and I have certainly had our 'differences
30 > of opinion' in the past; but I don't believe this is one of those occasions.
31 >
32 > Calling out bad actors (not saying veremit is one, I just mean in the general
33 > sense) is an unfortunate but important task, but call them out on bad
34 > behaviour, not for what appears to be an impassioned but otherwise
35 > unremarkable query.
36 >
37
38 I agree with this 100 percent. Not judging solely on the content of the
39 specific email in the thread does not allow people to grow and improve. Are we
40 all to be judged on our past behavior forever with no chance to overcome past
41 transgressions ?
42
43
44
45 > --
46 > Sam Jorna (wraeth)
47 > GnuPG ID: 0xD6180C26
48 >
49
50
51
52 --
53 Mike Pagano
54 Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
55 Gentoo Sources - Member
56 E-Mail : mpagano@g.o
57 GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
58 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3&op=index

Replies