Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:51:33
Message-Id: 20070313224843.GA25646@superlupo.rechner
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo by Grant Goodyear
1 On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:09:53PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
2 > * Can we find a better name than "the Proctors", please?
3 > Yes, that's a completely petty point, but it was the first
4 > one that came to mind.
5
6 +1, i think i haven't ever heard that word before, and it sounds quite
7 empty to me as a non english person.
8
9 > * I understand the desire to act quickly, so that it appears that Gentoo
10 > is doing something about this problem. However, I agree with those who
11 > think that a few days isn't really enough time for an adequate
12 > discussion. For this sort of policy to be effective, devs need to
13 > agree with it. The Council can still make temporary rules on Thursday
14 > while allowing the rest of the process to occur more leisurely.
15
16 Wanted to write something like that too, but your version is better
17 than mine. ;-)
18
19 cheers,
20 Wernfried
21
22 --
23 Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org
24 Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org
25 IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org