| 1 |
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 02:28, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 2 |
> Personally, I would go for package.mask |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I like this solution better. I don't know how many of you know that on |
| 5 |
some 2.4 version, Marcelo forgot to add a patch that was added to -rc4, |
| 6 |
to the realeased kernel. So I had to use this kernel on splack |
| 7 |
(slackware for sparc) instead of the released kernel, because this patch |
| 8 |
was extremely important on archs other than intel. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
If you had a package mask, this could be handleded more gracefully. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Alvaro Figueroa |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives