| 1 |
On 09/17/2015 12:05 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:08 -0400 |
| 3 |
> "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Totally rethink the idea of emails aliases as something that is |
| 6 |
>> created on the fly. We just need to know who should get emails for a |
| 7 |
>> package when it comes to bug reports. Why can't that be calculated |
| 8 |
>> on the fly from the metadata.xml? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I've not read every last part of this thread but I think I like where |
| 11 |
> this is going. I just want to be sure that people besides those in the |
| 12 |
> Java herd/project/whatever can continue to receive emails for |
| 13 |
> java@g.o. For instance, gnu_andrew is not a dev and does not |
| 14 |
> intend to be but he still likes to be CC'd on all Java mail. I would |
| 15 |
> not like to have to add his address to the metadata.xml of every Java |
| 16 |
> package. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
i might not understand 100% what you are trying to say but why not add |
| 19 |
gnu_andrew to the java mail alias on pecker? how is metadata.xml going |
| 20 |
to solve this problem? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Regards, |
| 24 |
Markos Chandras |
Archives