Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for October
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:32:37
Message-Id: 200710020617.17275.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for October by Steve Long
1 On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Steve Long wrote:
2 > Agreed, as it leaves Gentoo without a Council for a month, and you could
3 > end up with no consistency at all viz date of elections. Stating that the
4 > officials must be selected before the nomination process can be started,
5 > and that the same deadline applies (one month of nominations, one of
6 > voting) seems like good planning. Might as well get the whole process
7 > sorted with one vote and move on.
8
9 this was all cleared up the last meeting
10
11 > I also concur with whoever said Council meeting notifications should be
12 > discussed on project (maybe a reply-to project for the notification if it
13 > needs to go to dev to ensure everyone sees it) since the discussion is
14 > rarely about technical stuff, despite that being most of the work which the
15 > Council does. Even for technical matters, the discussions i have seen at
16 > least on dev about Council decisions, have always been contentious and
17 > veered off into non-technical aspects (which is probably why they're on the
18 > Council agenda in the first place.)
19
20 no. the point of the notice was that so people who were trying to get
21 technical standards passed did not forget about the timeline of doing so.
22 i'll see about duplicating the notice to -project though.
23 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature