Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: solar <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed changes to base profile for Gentoo/ALT
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:17:37
Message-Id: 1130947964.19786.17.camel@alto
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed changes to base profile for Gentoo/ALT by Mike Frysinger
1 On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 14:38 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 01:11:24PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
3 > > I would have some other changes for virtuals, but they are less important
4 > > right now.
5 >
6 > it depends on the changes ... i'm more likely to tell you to just override
7 > them in your own tree :P
8 >
9 > > Obviously if this is going to be applied the missing packages should be added
10 > > to the packages of default-linux and other linux profiles that does inherit
11 > > from base.
12 >
13 > linux-based profiles should inherit default-linux rather than base anyways ...
14
15 Mike,
16
17 Thats a lot easier said than done and I'd rather us not inherit from
18 default-linux for the uclibc, hardened and it looks as if selinux,
19 vserver profiles also inherit directly from base.
20 I'd rather us keep it this way and or add another stop gap profile
21 between default-linux and base such as profiles/linux-core as using
22 default-linux as a parent is going to add alot more cruft that we may
23 want.
24
25 --
26 solar <solar@g.o>
27 Gentoo Linux
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed changes to base profile for Gentoo/ALT Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>