Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina" <zerochaos@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 17:56:27
Message-Id: 5388C6DC.1040000@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? by Fabio Erculiani
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 05/30/2014 01:39 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
5 > configs should have never gotten into genkernel in the first place.
6 > it's each kernel pkg (or even version) that owns a valid config of
7 > itself.
8 > I am part of genkernel@ but I have no will nor time to fix it. And
9 > when I have, I'd rather work on genkernel-next, that comes with a much
10 > more readable initramfs code (that I managed to rewrite myself).
11 >
12 > Wiping the whole config files has been on my agenda for very long time already.
13
14 And replaced by what? defconfig? allmodconfig?
15
16 - -Zero
17 >
18 > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
19 >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com> wrote:
20 >>> As nice at it sounds to just DROP these configs, that option is not really
21 >>> feasible considering the way we currently use genkernel in our handbook.
22 >>> Relying on the kernel's own defconfig, "genkernel all" will NOT produce the
23 >>> same mostly-usable-on-any-hardware result that we now rely on.
24 >>
25 >> Considering that the configs are more generically useful than
26 >> genkernel, having them separately maintained sort-of makes sense.
27 >> Then genkernel is a kernel build/install/initramfs tool, not a config
28 >> management tool.
29 >>
30 >> I'd stick them someplace where any dev can get to them, and separate
31 >> them from the genkernel functional code base.
32 >>
33 >> As far as who takes care of them goes - I suggest that this stuff
34 >> comes out of the devmanual unless somebody steps up to take care of
35 >> them. Those who take care of them become those who want to keep them
36 >> around. You can't toss out a tool and ask for it to be a
37 >> recommendation but point to others that you think need to maintain its
38 >> configuration.
39 >>
40 >> Rich
41 >>
42 >
43 >
44 >
45
46 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
47 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
48 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
49
50 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTiMbcAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKWGAP/3PwUkUTqUIQrORooQv4ZTR8
51 CX/oI8jmhA8o+3QELpti8JY0qP8rak45w++7Hofyg5MD8UimS3jhUr5jWwS3gGyS
52 K/SWIPlDsSDIrp0hQO4oTqT2zw3m1C/A+zpdElF5wtNZrEsF86rcn1CeO9ZKMUUq
53 pet3qjPHhzOtts9QoyejIyTtm+iIzig7RlbuIYQmf44C8I0ZHhXnDiKfLc8TFLYE
54 N0gpm9GzMpIP60hbRRAKfCtNqjG0y3XvJJSgHm+tdlx6+1dQXkSJjrkvMvI/L7gH
55 oLFqT8TYpHf9aMkr32Hy2LY/b1dwDZqqjXozB+/Sgdgvh7XWtALLJO6WJovuVst5
56 Bhv1ADlBA8w9FQLqwi0QMapqf94lslmqfr4QEmWz/QURv8CM2gSsTqfqouxlI+HB
57 QPWzM/pzyAi3UW8nP7lTfC96SrSoy8Vsop2/CxJxzUW0y3VGoRi3Ckuo38MXKiXI
58 aHkKL+UisOWbbPWtU6TphRrdmphEkICOSvIVzRFA84I9hIgQF6EPic2TyY/+G2xz
59 gKORB0BeTA2SnOjZ3S5uJClHViVugCepGVpy2J1WkTIb0sBJwchV8t5ssN1Aa+Vm
60 9uAXkDCK0tw8jK3pgsa+zweBA22LYIisk3TYq27+zOh11uso0kE6XXT/sunQZKOz
61 /j2iAIh3/rhC4Y/OMNal
62 =hNQF
63 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----