| 1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> I agree. But Python 3.1 doesn't have more issues than Python 2.6, so |
| 3 |
> the stabilization is reasonable. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
And how about all of the packages in the tree that use python? You are |
| 6 |
missing that huge part. That's like saying libfoo works absolutely |
| 7 |
great, but every single application that links to libfoo now breaks with |
| 8 |
the new release of libfoo-2.0. The things that use your package are |
| 9 |
just as important when looking to stablize something or to move it out |
| 10 |
of package.mask. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Mark Loeser |
| 14 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
| 15 |
email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
| 16 |
web - http://www.halcy0n.com |
Archives