| 1 |
Rich Freeman posted on Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:55:31 -0400 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Or they could just clone the git tree, and they can look at per-file |
| 4 |
> logs anytime they want to. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Give me ro access to a current git repo and I'll *VERY* happily leave |
| 7 |
changelogs to history along with 8-track tapes and 5.25-inch floppies! |
| 8 |
=:^) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I was strongly in favor of keeping changelogs (and mandating proper add/ |
| 11 |
change/deletion entries) the last time the topic came up, but that was in |
| 12 |
the context of (web)?rsync being the only viable user sync method and |
| 13 |
thus changelogs being the only user-local-accessible record. With user- |
| 14 |
git-repo access, I'll /very/ (very, very, very...) happily leave rsync |
| 15 |
behind for git, and changelogs along with it! =:^) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 19 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 20 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives