Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: KDE split ebuilds
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:26:21
Message-Id: 200503191826.14318.danarmak@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: KDE split ebuilds by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Friday 18 March 2005 18:21, Duncan wrote:
2 > This seems an appropriate place to mention that I was pleasantly surprised
3 > to see an ARTS version that actually matched the KDE version, this time
4 > around. =8^) I always wondered why they hadn't jumped the version to
5 > match, and am glad it happened now, regardless of whether it was Gentoo or
6 > KDE that made the decision.
7 It was gentoo. The upstream version is still 1.x.y not 3.x.y.
8
9 --
10 Dan Armak
11 Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
12 Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
13 Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951