| 1 |
On Sun, 2015-08-09 at 17:30 +0200, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > I'd just go with "Gentoo-Bug". The X- is pointless since it was |
| 6 |
> > for eXtending Email-Headers. And what we do is only linked in |
| 7 |
> > style. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'd be fine with that and add a reference to the kernel guideline [0] to |
| 11 |
> the wiki as well, so that it is clear that we also allow/use Acked-by, |
| 12 |
> Reviewed-by, Suggested-by and whatnot. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I'll wait for more ++ though. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> [0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
++ from me. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
And a question: what about multiple bugs fixed by one commit? Is it |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Gentoo-Bug: 1234567, 1234568 |
| 24 |
or |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Gentoo-Bug: 1234567 |
| 27 |
Gentoo-Bug: 1234568 |
Archives