Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Resignation
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:09:56
Message-Id: 20070419120743.5f952ad1@snowflake
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Resignation by Steve Long
1 On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:36:09 +0100
2 Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
3 > <snip examples of bad behaviour>
4 > > ...does anyone want another few pages of that kind of thing? Devrel
5 > > has for once gotten something more or less right. Perhaps people
6 > > should be thanking them instead.
7 > >
8 > You're ignoring the point made about the amount of bugs Jakub kept
9 > away from devs and the loss of his influence on QA
10
11 Jakub's influence on QA is best summed up by the likes of
12 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160328 and
13 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167285#c11 ...
14
15 > It's not just me that thinks there haven't been any major b0rkages for
16 > nearly a year. Could it be that maybe, just maybe, the development
17 > process has actually worked /better/ since you were forcibly retired?
18
19 Please stop that nonsense... You've already repeatedly been asked to
20 stop turning everything into random attacks upon unrelated parties...
21
22 --
23 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Resignation George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com>