| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:29:29 +0200 |
| 3 |
> "Ioannis Aslanidis" <aslanidis@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > The real point is that bug-wranglers has lost over 50% of it's |
| 5 |
>> > effectiveness, again imo. jakub and spanky are the two main guys, |
| 6 |
>> > and it's not just the loss of jakub's prodigious work-rate, which |
| 7 |
>> > kept a lot bugs from even reaching devs, but the loss of his |
| 8 |
>> > influence on QA which is a complete disaster for gentoo. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Add +1 to that. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
<snip examples of bad behaviour> |
| 13 |
> ...does anyone want another few pages of that kind of thing? Devrel has |
| 14 |
> for once gotten something more or less right. Perhaps people should be |
| 15 |
> thanking them instead. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
You're ignoring the point made about the amount of bugs Jakub kept away from |
| 18 |
devs, and the loss of his influence on QA. Quoting examples of his bad |
| 19 |
bahaviour doesn't change the fact that it is unacceptable for devrel to |
| 20 |
discuss his case without involving him. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Please note this is not the same as discussing a complaint with the |
| 23 |
complainant, prior to discussing a dev's behaviour as a team. And no, I |
| 24 |
don't want pages more; I agree Jakub can be difficult. But at least he is |
| 25 |
difficult in the cause of achieving something real and positive for gentoo. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
And from the comments of others, *he gets the result*. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
It's not just me that thinks there haven't been any major b0rkages for |
| 30 |
nearly a year. Could it be that maybe, just maybe, the development process |
| 31 |
has actually worked /better/ since you were forcibly retired? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives