| 1 |
On Friday 13 April 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 11:23 -0500, Alex Tarkovsky wrote: |
| 3 |
> > It's mid-April and 2007.0 is still nowhere in sight, so the idea that |
| 4 |
> > there will be a 2007.1 is looking increasingly unrealistic. Please |
| 5 |
> > don't make baselayout-2's unmasking contingent on that. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I guess I should just delete all this 2007.0 media we've been working on |
| 8 |
> then, huh? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'm simply amazed at the level of complete and total bullshit that some |
| 11 |
> people spout off on this list without bothering to check facts or take 3 |
| 12 |
> seconds to talk to the people in the know. If you don't know what |
| 13 |
> you're talking about, rather than open your mouth and prove to everyone |
| 14 |
> that you are clueless about the particular topic, it's probably best to |
| 15 |
> either ask someone or talk about something you're actually familiar |
| 16 |
> with, instead. For those of you wondering, 2007.0 is close to being |
| 17 |
> finished. You can blame the abnormally high number of security |
| 18 |
> vulnerabilities in large packages for the delays. Also, the dates given |
| 19 |
> on the Release Engineering pages are nothing more than guesses made by |
| 20 |
> me months before we even start the release. They are in no way binding. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
so full of hate ! |
| 23 |
-mike |
Archives