| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Saturday 04 October 2003 04:13 pm, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 5 |
> Every dev and user who has responded has said it's a Very Bad Idea. Why |
| 6 |
> are you still arguing for it? |
| 7 |
I am still *discussing* it because there have been things to respond to. IIRC, |
| 8 |
most of which have been misunderstanding the idea. I don't expect many people |
| 9 |
on -dev would use such a feature anyway, it would mostly be used by people |
| 10 |
not involved in development very much who might use it. |
| 11 |
Again, it was just an idea and I don't care much whether or not it gets |
| 12 |
implemented, but that's no reason to ignore the idea completely and not |
| 13 |
discuss various positive or negative impacts it would have. |
| 14 |
- -- |
| 15 |
Luke-Jr |
| 16 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 17 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 18 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 19 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
iD8DBQE/fwJ/Zl/BHdU+lYMRAr12AJ91WvLnEUX56uo30tClnXGYeqpEmwCfT3Oq |
| 22 |
hu8JaP0vKP1IUxtztDigtw0= |
| 23 |
=ZgQZ |
| 24 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives