1 |
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 3:55 PM, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> Because containers are awesome and are way easier to use. |
5 |
>> |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I think you missed my point: Why are they easier to use? |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
I suspect that he was equating "containers" with "Docker," which both |
11 |
runs containers and also is an image management solution (one that I |
12 |
don't particularly like, but probably because I don't have heavy needs |
13 |
so I find myself fighting it more than anything else - it doesn't hurt |
14 |
that for the life of me I can't get it to connect containers to my |
15 |
bridge, and it seems like it is completely opposed to just using DHCP |
16 |
to obtain IPs). |
17 |
|
18 |
But, if you're using Docker, sure, you can run whatever the command is |
19 |
to download an image of a container with some software pre-installed |
20 |
and run it. |
21 |
|
22 |
If you're using something other than Docker to manage your containers |
23 |
then you still have to get the software you want to use installed in |
24 |
your container image. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Rich |