| 1 |
As these would be @gentoo.org <http://gentoo.org> people they would be |
| 2 |
easier for devrel to tackle. Making them closer under the gentoo wing just |
| 3 |
makes them easier to dicipline. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 11/19/05, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:34:10 -0800 Corey Shields <cshields@g.o> |
| 8 |
> wrote: |
| 9 |
> | Why not ditch the idea of yellow-starred "arch testers" and make it |
| 10 |
> | easy for *all* users to participate in the stability-validation of |
| 11 |
> | all of our packages? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> We've seen why this won't work in the past... Too few users know how to |
| 14 |
> do proper testing. We've had "please keyword, works for me" bugs for |
| 15 |
> things that will always segfault on startup. We've had several people |
| 16 |
> who think it'd be clever to automate testing reports. We've got enough |
| 17 |
> ricers out there that clearly broken things would end up getting "works |
| 18 |
> for me" spammed even more than they are already... |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) |
| 22 |
> Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org <http://gentoo.org> |
| 23 |
> Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
Archives