| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:35:34 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Hence -scm... |
| 5 |
>> that cannot do as well for more than a single target w/out using use |
| 6 |
>> flags. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Because it isn't supposed to. Versions and topics are not the same |
| 9 |
> thing, and treating topics as versions leads to mishandling. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
master is just a name, you may have the main development happen in |
| 13 |
another branch (say devel) and the stabler tree is kept on the master |
| 14 |
branch and you may want to track both as well. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Or even worse, you get two lines of development you want to track that |
| 17 |
stay in completely different vcs. And that is the case of a real |
| 18 |
package, not theory. In those cases having a template could help a bit, |
| 19 |
having -scm + useflag is exactly the same as having bare useflags and slots. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
>> Then if you continued to read you'll notice that |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> ...you got so incoherent I gave up trying to work out what you're on |
| 24 |
> about. You still haven't shown how to solve the simple example I gave |
| 25 |
> earlier in the thread. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Relying to offense because I just pointed out something you dislikes |
| 28 |
since you cannot find a argumentative way reply isn't exactly polite or |
| 29 |
mature. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Luca Barbato |
| 35 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 36 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 37 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
Archives