| 1 |
On 6 March 2010 10:11, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> If no, I can split off utils from poppler - with CMake it's effortless. |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> We just rejoined the split poppler into one package again. So if you |
| 6 |
>> are going to split it up again, you will have some explaining to do to |
| 7 |
>> our users. I would like to prevent splitting, and see if we can fix maybe |
| 8 |
>> the cups ebuild instead. Or maybe the gtk+ maintainers want to split |
| 9 |
>> up their package... I understand they like that sort of thing. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> These kind of pot-shots at Mart and the GNOME team are not welcome. |
| 13 |
> Please desist from making such unproductive statements. This is |
| 14 |
> precisely how flames begin, and this thread already has too much |
| 15 |
> heated argument going on. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'm sorry, it's just rubbing me the wrong way that many people here |
| 18 |
assume that the best solution is to split poppler again, while not even |
| 19 |
looking at other possible solutions. But let's try to be more constructive |
| 20 |
instead. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Would it be possible to make cups a PDEPEND in gtk+ or is it really |
| 23 |
needed at compile time? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
The same for cups: can we make poppler a PDEPEND? Maciej, did |
| 26 |
you get any further with looking into that? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
And how about splitting cups, as Pacho mentioned, so that gtk+ |
| 29 |
would only need the lib? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Cheers, |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Ben de Groot |
| 34 |
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc) |
| 35 |
______________________________________________________ |
Archives