Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set]
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 06:44:30
Message-Id: 21517.20549.80274.661570@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] by Joshua Kinard
1 >>>>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014, Joshua Kinard wrote:
2
3 > On 09/07/2014 16:45, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
4 >> There's neither nano nor any other specific editor in the system set,
5 >> to start with. There is virtual/editor which I think is the best
6 >> choice, unless we would decide that no editor is needed at all.
7
8 > The stage2/stage3 catalyst runs I did recently always dragged in nano &
9 > ncurses. I did very little customization to the build profiles or the
10 > specs, so something was favouring nano over other editors.
11
12 nano is preferred because it appears first in the list of dependencies
13 in virtual/editor.
14
15 Ulrich