| 1 |
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:48:53 +0200 foser <foser@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
| > For those of you who missed it the first three times, *the current |
| 3 |
| > system works*. |
| 4 |
| |
| 5 |
| This is just not true, i've seen it break things & this will happen |
| 6 |
| more and more in the future. I've posted a recent example on -dev |
| 7 |
| already, so I don't even know why you can still knowingly make this |
| 8 |
| false statement. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
And as I recall, the example you provided was invalid, since a) the |
| 11 |
packages in question weren't stable on mips anyway, and b) it fixed a |
| 12 |
lot more than it broke. I'd also like to point out that we have a lot of |
| 13 |
happy users running our stable trees, and that the *only* complaint |
| 14 |
we've had regarding our keywording policies for sparc and mips came from |
| 15 |
a developer who has absolutely nothing to do with the archs in question. |
| 16 |
So, from the perspective of the people who actually use our trees, yes, |
| 17 |
the system works. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) |
| 21 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 22 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives