Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] quixote currently unmaintained
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:46:24
Message-Id: 20051101174316.GA13355@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] quixote currently unmaintained by Carsten Lohrke
1 On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:04:08PM +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
2 > On Monday 31 October 2005 22:44, Petteri Räty wrote:
3 > > Checked the bugzilla and the two open bugs seem to be version bumps. I
4 > > think the policy is not to remove working ebuilds from the tree although
5 > > they are not maintained by anyone.
6 >
7 > It's not policy to keep unmaintained stuff in the repository either.
8
9 You are technically correct in the sense that there is literally no
10 policy stating "keep unmaintained stuff in the repository."
11
12 However, going around removing things simply because they're
13 unmaintained is no good. Unmaintained and broken is a different story.
14
15 --
16 Jon Portnoy
17 avenj/irc.freenode.net
18
19 --
20 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] quixote currently unmaintained Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] quixote currently unmaintained Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>