1 |
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 18:43, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
2 |
> You are technically correct in the sense that there is literally no |
3 |
> policy stating "keep unmaintained stuff in the repository." |
4 |
|
5 |
All I wanted to say is that we have no policy about it and a fair share of |
6 |
rotten ebuilds in the repository reflects this. I do not say we should remove |
7 |
every (temporarily) unmaintained package, nor do I care about exactly this |
8 |
one, but at least grant does it in this case and advises to remove it, if no |
9 |
one is willing to take it. Now we can hear voices "no, someone could miss |
10 |
it", instead just taking over maintainership. |
11 |
|
12 |
The bottom line: No one really needs to take care of the packages they |
13 |
maintain and those who do, get the reply not to do. Oh, if Grant just had |
14 |
(against policy) removed the package silently as others did here and there - |
15 |
probably no one had bothered. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
Carsten |