Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml?
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:09:30
Message-Id: 1173978347.6170.8.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? by Stephen Becker
1 OK, you three. Knock it off. Right now. This is exactly the sort of
2 utter nonsense that we've been talking about viz. what's going on on
3 this mailing list.
4
5 There is no excuse to be an asshole, Stephen, because in doing so (even
6 as a retaliation) renders your own point null and void. It's one thing
7 to defend a teammate, it's entirely another to display the sort of
8 behavioural issues that you seem intent on doing.
9
10 George, please take your concerns to DevRel, rather than this list.
11
12 Steve (long): you've been going on and on in various threads after only
13 half-reading, do you really need to respond to everything, everywhere,
14 every time?
15
16 The thing is, (this goes for all three of you, at a minimum), just
17 because you *can* speak, does not necessarily mean that you *should*.
18
19 Thanks,
20
21 Seemant

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature